tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15959453.post113952601052553915..comments2024-03-27T18:21:58.890+11:00Comments on This isn't Sydney: Pollie WaffleSpikehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04711311734492421302noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15959453.post-1139748700936456542006-02-12T23:51:00.000+11:002006-02-12T23:51:00.000+11:00Piss off, Chamberpot.Piss off, Chamberpot.Spikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04711311734492421302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15959453.post-1139713454834421412006-02-12T14:04:00.000+11:002006-02-12T14:04:00.000+11:00One last comment, because people have some pretty ...One last comment, because people have some pretty wierd ideas about what a Constitutional Monarch is. Hereditary succession is not an absolute. The Monarch (in the UK) constitutionaly holds his or her position "...by the will of Parliament" When Elizabeth dies, it will be Parliament which decides if Charles is next or not and he will only be crowned after that vote is made. Several times in the last 250 years Parliament has decided to NOT allow a regular succession and picked someone else..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15959453.post-1139712576069803412006-02-12T13:49:00.000+11:002006-02-12T13:49:00.000+11:00Gawd...this inaccurate rundown of the form of gove...Gawd...this inaccurate rundown of the form of government in Australia is a good argument for having Civic Classes as they do here in the US. The Governor and Governor-General are NOT the head of any governments. They are Head Of State. The Premiers and Prime Minister are Head Of Government. How this differs from the US model is that the position of President combines BOTH functions in one position..although outside a parliamentary context, so the Head of Government (The President) isn't required to form his government from elected politicians - he can form a government (cabinet)from his political cronies, donors and other brown nosers without ever needing to stand up in Congress every Tuesday and answer for his actions as a Prime Minister is required to do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15959453.post-1139711812581053662006-02-12T13:36:00.000+11:002006-02-12T13:36:00.000+11:00Constitutionally the current monarch IS Queen of A...Constitutionally the current monarch IS Queen of Australia. This role is seperate from her role as Queen of England, Ireland, Scotland and Dominions. The procedure is that the holder of the throne of England (specifically) is also de-facto Monarch of Australia, however by the Constitution Act of 1901 and the Australia Act of 1983 (?) which was passed in both the House of Commons in the UK and the House of Representatives in Australia, the Queen was confirmed as 'Queen of Australia'. The Australia Act severed all and any remaining legislative ties to the Parliament of the UK, confirming and completing a process begun by the Constitution Act of 1901 and the so-called 'Commonwealth and Dominions Act' of 1934.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15959453.post-1139611445098353602006-02-11T09:44:00.000+11:002006-02-11T09:44:00.000+11:00You do seem to have more and more vociferous and s...You do seem to have more and more vociferous and self-righteous crazy persons with political ambitions that we do :) <BR/><BR/>We've got a few nutters and supremists. Idiots like Paul Hanson ("Please explain") the dimwit from Queensland and <A HREF="http://woywoywalkies.blogspot.com/2006/01/leviathan.html" REL="nofollow">those nutters from Birmingham's book</A> rear their ugly mugs from time to time and there's a rather ugly crowd at the moment called FamilySomething. One of their party members was stupid enough to tell a journo lesbians should be burned at the stake so I s'pose they'll get a small but fanatical following of criminally-minded nutters.<BR/><BR/>But there's very little political violence in this country (not counting small-time nutters blowing each other away in drunken hazes). Probably due to a combination of differences in culture, a lower population leading to a lower number of nutters and our habit of <A HREF="http://ducktionary.blogspot.com/2006/01/t.html#takingthepiss" REL="nofollow">taking the piss</A> out of pollies rather than deifying them. If we ever get a Bill of Rights it'll be just a long list of people and institutions we've got a right to take the piss out of.Spikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04711311734492421302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15959453.post-1139593559281867922006-02-11T04:45:00.000+11:002006-02-11T04:45:00.000+11:00You are so kind. It's rather more perplexing than...You are so kind. It's rather more perplexing than I imagined, down there where you are. Over here we only have two parties, the Massively Corrupt Party of Power and Money that's running the show, and the only Slightly Less Massively Corrupt Party of Gutless Wonders who act as a perfect foil for the party in charge by running around in circles saying stupid things and trying to find their asses with both hands. Of course, this is America, so we also have our Fringe Element of Crazy People With More Money Than Sense who occasionally line up for a big asskicking by the MCPPM (Bushies for short.)Suzanne44https://www.blogger.com/profile/12207639333768070831noreply@blogger.com